SEE
ALSO: > Press
releases > WTO news
archives > Pascal Lamy’s
speeches
Last year’s press release
(11 April 2006) > Trade picks
up in mid-2005, but 2006 picture is uncertain
|
In their preliminary assessment of trade in 2006
and prospects for the coming year, they said the consensus among
forecasters of around 3% global economic growth in 2007 could slow
merchandise trade growth to about 6% compared with 8% in 2006.
By contrast, the world economy and trade grew
vigorously in 2006, the 8% expansion in merchandise trade being the second
highest since 2000. Growth in gross domestic product (GDP) — a measure of
the size of the economy — was stronger than expected in Europe and Japan.
The Chinese and Indian economies continued to record high growth.
Least-developed countries’ trade grew by about
30%, fuelled by higher prices for petroleum and other primary commodities.
They and developing countries as a whole saw their shares of world
merchandise trade reach record proportions. And for some of the smaller
suppliers, fear of a setback in textiles and clothing in the face of
competition from China proved unfounded in 2006.
“The strong performance of 2006 is welcome,
particularly the gains made by developing and least-developed countries,”
WTO Director-General Pascal Lamy said. “But this has to be consolidated.
The uncertainties that lie ahead are a warning for us not to lose sight of
the need to continue to reform the world economy.”
“The best contribution the WTO can make is to keep
strengthening the multilateral trading system. One of the unsung
achievements of the system is its stabilizing effect on world trade and
the global economy. A successful conclusion to the Doha Round holds great
potential for boosting growth and alleviating poverty. An agreement would
also deliver more relevant trade rules, helping to establish a more stable
and certain foundation for today’s dynamic global marketplace.”
Overview of major trade developments in
2006
The overall picture in 2006 was of trade expanding
in real terms (i.e. ignoring price changes), faster than output by a large
margin. The dollar value of world merchandise exports increased by 15% to
$11.76 trillion in 2006. Commercial services exports were up by an
estimated 11% and reached $2.71 trillion in 2006.
Price changes affected the nominal merchandise
trade growth rates of countries and whole regions. The annual average
prices for fuels and metals rose sharply, benefiting the export earnings
of fuels and metal exporters.
The four regions with the highest share of fuels
and other mining products in their merchandise exports (the Middle East,
Africa, the Commonwealth of Independent States — CIS — and South and
Central America) again recorded the strongest annual export rise in
2006.
The United States recorded its best annual
merchandise export growth in more than a decade but its trade deficit
continued to grow. However, when adjusted for price changes, US
merchandise exports expanded faster than world trade and faster than US
imports.
China’s trade growth continued to outstrip other
major traders. China’s merchandise exports grew by 27%. In the second half
of 2006, its merchandise exports started to exceed those of the United
States, but for the whole year US exports still exceeded those of
China.
Least-developed countries’ exports rose sharply in
2006 due to much larger values of fuels exports and stronger exports of
other primary products and manufactured goods.
Developing countries’ share of world merchandise
exports reached an all time record of 36%. The 0.9%,share for
least-developed countries was also a record, the highest level since 1980,
the earliest data kept by the WTO.
The picture for textiles and clothing is better
for small suppliers with preferences in developed country markets than
many had feared following the 2005 elimination of quotas and of the WTO’s
Agreement on Textiles and Clothing.
As expected, China has enhanced its role as the
leading supplier. Low and lower-middle income countries have seen their
share of world exports of textiles and clothing increase markedly. The
richer developing countries, including the newly-industrializing Asian
economies (NICs) and Mexico, lost market share. Some small suppliers also
lost shares, but others gained. Overall, in 2006, the least-developed
countries increased their shares of developed countries’ textiles imports.
The fact that China, India and Bangladesh performed well also means that
millions of low-income workers benefited.
Details: the state of the world economy and
trade in 2006
The year 2006 witnessed robust growth in the world
economy and vigorous trade expansion. Global gross domestic production
(GDP) growth accelerated to 3.7%, the second best performance since 2000.
All major regions recorded GDP growth in excess of population growth.
Economic growth in the least-developed countries
continued to exceed 6% for the third year in a row. A large part of the
stronger global economy is attributable to the recovery in Europe, which
turned out to be stronger than expected in early 2006. The United States
economy maintained its overall expansion as weaker domestic demand was
balanced by a reduction in the external deficit, mainly due to a faster
export growth. In Japan somewhat faster economic growth was achieved
despite weaker domestic demand reflected in a widening of its external
surplus. China and India continued to report outstandingly high economic
and trade growth.
Strong economic fundamentals in many key economies
contributed to stronger investor confidence worldwide. General government
deficits decreased in the United States, the European Union and in Japan
and inflationary pressures were contained. A high level of global monetary
liquidity combined with a low level of real interest rates contributed to
a rally on global stock markets. Stock markets in emerging economies again
recorded much faster growth than those in developed economies. Increased
investor confidence in emerging markets is also reflected in the sharply
reduced spread in interest margins between emerging market bonds and those
of US government bonds.
The more favourable investment climate is also
reflected in a sharp rise in global foreign direct investment (FDI) flows
in 2006, which approached the record levels of the past. UNCTAD
(1) reports that global FDI inflows surged by
one-third to $1.23 trillion, the second highest level ever. The high
growth of global FDI flows can be attributed partly to increased mergers
and acquisitions activity and higher share prices. A high level of total
net private capital flows to emerging markets was reported by the
Institute of International Finance. (2)
A further sign of high global liquidity is the
rise in global foreign exchange reserves and the advanced re-payment of
external public debt by a number of developing countries. Debt levels,
measured by the outstanding debt to GDP ratios, decreased in all
developing regions partly due to debt forgiveness. For the heavily
indebted poor countries the debt levels in 2006 are estimated to have come
down to half the level reported five years ago. (3)
The real effective exchange rate of the US dollar
continued to depreciate moderately, contributing to the readjustment of
the US current account deficit (the trade deficit in goods and
services)(4). The exchange rates of the Asian economies
with large current account surpluses fared differently in 2006. On an
annual average basis, real effective exchange rates appreciated
significantly in the case of the Republic of Korea and Singapore and
moderately in the case of China. The Japanese Yen, however, continued to
depreciate in 2006.(5)
High global liquidity and a further steep rise in
the price of fuels and nominal interest rates has not so far translated
into higher domestic inflation rates. In developed markets consumer price
increases averaged between 2% and 3%, and in the developing economies the
rate was about 5%. In both developed and developing regions no
acceleration in consumer price inflation was observed between 2005 and
2006 (6). However, inflationary pressures can be
detected in sectors for which supply is less elastic, such as real estate
markets and auction prices for works of art.
The strong global macro-economic situation in 2006
provided a favourable framework for the expansion of international trade.
In 2006, world merchandise exports grew in real terms (i.e. at constant
prices) by 8.0%, compared to 6.5% in the preceding year. A large part of
this trade acceleration can be attributed to the marked recovery in
Europe’s export and import growth. Higher prices of fuels and metals led
to a stagnation in the quantity of mining products traded internationally
but the higher export earnings of oil exporters resulted in import growth
in excess of the world average. High energy prices also invigorated demand
for mining equipment and investment in machinery with high energy
efficiency.
China’s merchandise trade expansion remained
outstandingly strong in 2006. Office and telecom equipment continued to be
the mainstay of Chinese export growth but significant gains in world
market shares in 2006 could be observed in “traditional” exports such as
clothing and “new” products such as iron and steel. Chinese imports again
rose faster than global trade but continued to lag behind export
growth.
Trade prospects for 2007
The marked correction in share prices observed on
global stock markets at the end of February 2007 highlighted the increased
uncertainty of investors with respect to the short-term prospects of the
world economy. The consensus among forecasters favours a moderate
deceleration in world economic growth in 2007 (7). The economic fundamentals in the major
economies are strong enough to keep global economic growth close to 3%
(GDP measured at market exchange rates).
US domestic demand slowed markedly in the second
half of 2006 and is expected to weaken further in the first half of 2007.
Imports of goods and services contracted between the third and fourth
quarter (on a seasonally adjusted basis) and should remain subdued in the
first half of 2007 (see
Chart 1). The slowdown in GDP growth in Europe is expected to be less
pronounced than in the United States (and could be avoided in Japan),
maintaining developed countries economic growth close to 2.5% in 2007.
Demand in the oil importing countries is expected to benefit from on
average lower import prices of fuels in 2007. Although endogenous factors
have played an increasing role in developing country economic performance
over the last decade, the slowdown in industrial markets is likely to
contribute to less dynamic growth in the developing world, which is still
expected to grow at least twice as fast as the developed markets. The most
likely scenario is that GDP growth in 2007 will slow down in all regions,
with relatively even growth among the regions in the developed and
developing areas.
Chart 1: Real GDP and trade growth of
United States, 2005-06 back to top
Source: OECD,
Olisnet.
The major risks to this scenario are found in
financial market developments, a dramatic downturn in the property
markets, and the continued existence of large current account imbalances.
The search for high yield investments has led to a rapid expansion of
financial instruments (hedge funds, carry trade).
Assuming the basic scenario of global economic GDP
growth of nearly 3%, global merchandise trade could slow down to about 6%
in 2007, or 2 percentage points less than in 2006. This estimate is
supported by the results of the Secretariat’s time series forecasting
model which predicts a slowdown in the OECD area’s imports of goods and
services to 4.5%, a 2.5 percentage point decrease from the rate observed
in 2006.
The downside risks associated with this trade
projection include a stronger than expected correction in highly priced
property markets, a pickup in inflation, and risk perceptions that could
lead to a further rise of interest rates. Interest rate rises could
trigger a correction of stock and bond markets and lower then predicted
levels of investment and private consumption.
Real merchandise trade developments and output
in 2006
The pick up in global economic activity was the
major factor in the vigorous expansion of global trade in 2006. Real
merchandise export growth is provisionally estimated to have grown by 8.0%
in 2006, almost two percentage points faster than in 2005, and well above
the average expansion of the last decade (1996-2006). The expansion of
real trade exceeded global output growth by more than 4 percentage points
(see
Chart 2).
Chart 2: Growth in the volume of world
merchandise trade and GDP, 1996-06 back to top (Annual percentage change)
Source:
WTO.
In 2006, the variation in regional real trade
growth increased even though economic growth by region differed less than
in the preceding year. These divergent developments can be attributed
largely to the terms of trade changes in favour of fuel-exporting
countries and regions. The North American region comprises two net
exporters of fuels and the United States, which is a major net importer of
fuels. The real merchandise exports of the United States rose by 10.5% in
2006, which was the highest growth rate since 1997 and almost two times
faster than its import growth. Energy related petroleum products decreased
by 2.5% in volume terms. Weaker domestic demand in the United States, a
lower real effective (i.e. trade weighted) dollar exchange rate, and
stronger global demand growth contributed to this favourable development.
Canada’s merchandise exports slowed down markedly due to the combination
of lower US demand and a marked appreciation of the Canadian dollar since
2002. Mexican merchandise trade expanded vigorously with both imports and
exports up by double digit rates as its economy recorded its best growth
since 2000.
At 13.5%, Asia’s real merchandise exports remained the
most buoyant of all regions. Asia’s imports rose faster than in the
preceding year and faster than world trade but continued to lag behind its
export growth. Most of the excess of Asia’s export over import growth can
be attributed to the region’s major traders, China and Japan. The
expansion of China’s exports was somewhat less dynamic in 2006 than in
2005, while Japan, the Republic of Korea and Chinese Taipei recorded a
faster growth (between 10% and 15%). Imports into Japan and Chinese
Taipei, however, advanced by only 2% to 3% in 2006.
Table 1: GDP and merchandise trade by
region, 2004-06 (Annual percentage
change at constant prices)
|
GDP |
Exports |
Imports |
|
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
North America |
3.9 |
3.2 |
3.4 |
8.0 |
6.0 |
8.5 |
10.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
United States |
3.9 |
3.2 |
3.4 |
8.5 |
8.0 |
10.5 |
11.0 |
6.0 |
5.5 |
South and Central America a |
6.9 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
13.0 |
8.0 |
2.0 |
18.5 |
14.0 |
10.5 |
Europe |
2.4 |
1.8 |
2.8 |
7.0 |
4.0 |
7.5 |
7.0 |
4.0 |
7.0 |
European Union (25) |
2.3 |
1.6 |
2.8 |
7.0 |
4.0 |
7.5 |
6.5 |
3.5 |
6.5 |
Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) |
8.0 |
6.7 |
7.5 |
12.0 |
3.5 |
3.0 |
16.0 |
18.0 |
20.0 |
Africa and Middle East |
6.0 |
5.5 |
5.4 |
8.0 |
5.0 |
1.0 |
14.0 |
13.0 |
8.5 |
Asia |
4.8 |
4.1 |
4.4 |
15.5 |
11.5 |
13.5 |
14.5 |
8.0 |
8.5 |
China |
10.1 |
9.9 |
10.7 |
24.0 |
25.0 |
22.0 |
21.5 |
11.5 |
16.5 |
Japan b |
2.7 |
1.9 |
2.2 |
13.5 |
5.0 |
10.0 |
6.5 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
India |
8.0 |
8.5 |
8.3 |
15.5 |
20.5 |
11.5 |
16.0 |
20.5 |
12.0 |
World |
3.9 |
3.2 |
3.7 |
10.0 |
6.5 |
8.0 |
... |
... |
... |
a Includes the Caribbean. b Trade
volume data are derived from customs values deflated by standard unit
values and an adjusted price index for electronic goods. Source: WTO.
Europe’s real merchandise exports recorded their
strongest annual growth since 2000, exceeding import growth (estimated at
7%) but continued to lag behind the global rate of trade expansion.
European countries recorded considerable variation in their trade
performance. Double-digit export growth can be observed for the countries
at its eastern border, ranging from Finland and the Baltic states in the
North to Turkey in the South. All these countries benefited from further
integration with the EU and the strength of import demand from the
Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) region. Both Germany and the
United Kingdom recorded export and import growth well above the European
average, while real trade growth was sluggish in Italy and Spain and
stagnated in France and Ireland.
The four net fuel exporting
regions (CIS, Middle East, Africa and South/Central America and the
Caribbean) only recorded a small increase in their export volume (of about
2 percentage points), while their imports rose faster than global trade in
2006 (Chart
3). The most buoyant imports of all regions were observed for
Commonwealth of Independent States, which are estimated to have expanded
by 20%, while the region’s real exports remained sluggish in 2006. In
contrast to these global trade developments, South and Central America’s
expansion rate of both exports and imports decelerated in 2006. Venezuela
recorded a marked contraction of her exports and those of Brazil rose by
less than 4%. The combined exports of Africa and the Middle East are
estimated to have almost stagnated, while imports, despite their
deceleration, continued to expand somewhat faster than the global average.
While the slowdown in the exports of these regions can be linked to
reduced demand for the more expensive categories of fuels and metals, the
increase in imports might be considered modest given the outstanding
income growth of these regions over the last three years. (8)
Chart 3: Real merchandise trade growth by
region, 2006 back to top (Annual percentage change)
a Includes the Caribbean. Source: WTO.
Nominal merchandise and commercial services
trade developments in 2006 (9)
World merchandise exports in dollar
value terms were strongly affected by price developments in 2006. Price
developments differed widely by sector in the course of the year.
According to the IMF commodity price indices, the world export prices of
minerals and non-ferrous metals increased by 56%, those of fuels by 20%
and those of food and agricultural raw materials by 10%. Export prices of
manufactured goods are estimated to have increased by not more than 3%
(10).
Chart 4: Export prices of selected primary
products, 2005 and 2006 back to top (Annual percentage change)
a Comprising coffee, cocoa beans and
tea. Source: IMF, International
Financial Statistics.
Price changes for manufactured goods
remained less strong than those for primary products for the third
consecutive year. An important element in the moderate price trends for
manufactured goods was the continued decline in prices for electronic
goods, which accounted for more than one in six dollars of world exports
of manufactured goods in 2005. These shifts in relative prices are
explained largely by the different regional export unit values (prices)
which ranged from 4% to 5% for Asia and Europe to about 18% to 20% for
exports of South and Central America, Africa, the Middle East and the CIS.
Information on price trends for world commercial services trade are not
available. However, the price deflators for US services exports and
imports increased between 3% and 4% in 2006, somewhat less rapidly than in
the preceding year.
Overall exchange rate developments in 2006
only had a moderate impact on the dollar price level of internationally
traded goods. Contrary to developments between 2002 and 2004, the average
annual exchange rate change between the US dollar and the euro and the
British pound had been rather moderate as divergent developments in the
course of 2005 and 2006 balanced each other. While a weaker yen might have
contributed to weaker dollar export prices of Japan, the appreciation of
the Canadian dollar and the currencies of several Asian traders had the
opposite effect (see
Chart 5).
Chart 5: Dollar changes vis-à-vis selected
major currencies, 2001-2006 back to top (Indices, January 2001=100)
a Trade weighted currency basket of the
Korean won, the Singapore dollar and Chinese Taipei dollar. Source: IMF, International Financial
Statistics.
World merchandise exports in dollar
terms rose by 15.4% to $11.76 trillion. About 40% of this value change can
be attributed to inflation. Commercial services exports rose by 11% to
$2.71 trillion. The increase in commercial services exports in 2006 was
about the same as in the preceding year and for the fourth consecutive
year less pronounced than that of merchandise trade. It is uncertain to
what extent divergent relative price developments have contributed to the
differences in the growth of merchandise and commercial services trade
values.
Table 2: World exports of merchandise and
commercial services, 2006 back to top
(Billion dollars and
percentage)
|
Value |
Annual percentage change |
|
2006 |
2000-06 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
Merchandise |
11762 |
11 |
22 |
14 |
15 |
Commercial services |
2710 |
10 |
20 |
11 |
11 |
Source:
WTO.
Merchandise exports by region in dollar
terms have been strongly affected again by price developments. The four
regions with the highest share of fuels and other mining products in their
merchandise exports — the Middle East (70% in 2005), Africa (65%), the
Commonwealth of Independent States (60%) and South/Central America (37%)
again recorded the strongest annual export increases in 2006. However, as
prices of fuels increased in 2006 less rapidly than in 2005, the sharp
rise in the export values of these regions were in effect smaller than in
the preceding year. The opposite development can be observed for the net
importers of fuels — North America, Europe and Asia reported a faster
export growth in 2006 than in 2005, although the growth in their shipments
remained less strong than that of the fuel exporting
regions.
Although Europe’s merchandise exports recorded the weakest
regional growth rate (13%), its share in world merchandise exports, at
42%, remained the largest of all regions. Europe’s imports rose by 14% to
$5.22 trillion. Intra-EU (25) trade rose by 13%, which was somewhat
stronger than export growth to third countries (11%) but slower than
imports from third countries (15%). The Baltics and the Balkan states
continued to record export and import growth in excess of 20%. The
combined exports/imports of the Balkan states exceed those of Turkey,
whose exports and imports also expanded faster than those of total
Europe.
In North America, Mexico reported stronger export and
import growth than its NAFTA partners. The United States reported its best
annual export growth performance (14%) in more than a decade, and although
US export growth exceeded its import growth (11%), the merchandise trade
deficit had grown already so large that it continued to grow in 2006. Only
in the fourth quarter, supported by the decline in import volumes and
falling import prices for crude oil, did the US merchandise trade deficit
started to decrease.
Asia’s merchandise exports and imports
continued to expand faster than world trade in 2006. Among the six major
Asian traders China continued to record the highest export and import
growth, and as its export growth continued to exceed its import growth,
the merchandise trade surplus rose sharply. In the course of 2006, China’s
trade surplus widened further as the momentum in the export expansion was
maintained while nominal import growth slackened, partly due to weaker oil
prices. The dollar value of Japan’s merchandise exports grew by nearly 9%
but continued to lag behind the expansion of world trade and its own
import growth. The fast growing economies of India and Viet Nam reported a
vigorous expansion of exports and imports, in the range of 20% to 35% in
2006. Since 1995, the exports and imports of these two countries have
expanded faster than Asia’s trade and their share in world merchandise
exports increased markedly. Among the smaller Asian traders, Bangladesh,
Cambodia and Mongolia continued their double-digit export expansion, a
feature since 2003, with exports up between 20% and 44% in 2006. The
merchandise trade of New Zealand virtually stagnated while that of Chinese
Taipei and the Philippines was less dynamic than world trade in
2006.
Africa’s merchandise exports rose by 21%, again faster than
imports, which are estimated to have increased by nearly 16%. The share of
Africa in world merchandise exports reached its highest level since 1990.
Although most of Africa’s export growth can be attributed to the rise in
oil exports, it is a noticeable development that non-oil exporting African
countries increased their exports by about 16%. It is estimated that about
one in 10 African countries experienced a decline in their exports, while
half of them recorded an export expansion which exceeded the global
average. South Africa, the region’s largest merchandise trader, reported a
rise in its imports of 24% while exports advanced by 13%.
Middle
Eastern trade has been strongly affected by political and oil market
developments. The region’s merchandise exports are estimated to have grown
by 19%, roughly in line with crude oil prices. Merchandise imports
increased by 14% which must be considered a rather moderate increase given
the surge in the region’s export earnings and foreign exchange reserves in
the past years.
Among the seven geographic regions distinguished
in this report, the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) recorded the
most dynamic export and import growth in 2006. Benefiting from strong fuel
and metal prices on world markets, the region’s exports increased by
one-quarter last year to $422 billion, more than twice the level recorded
only three years ago. Imports rose by nearly one-third to $278 billion,
but the region’s merchandise trade surplus continued to expand by about
$20 billion in 2006.
South/Central America’s merchandise exports
and imports continued to expand faster than world trade in 2006 even
though their growth was less pronounced than in the preceding year. The
deceleration in the region’s export growth is attributable largely to the
performance of the region’s oil exporters and Brazil. Sharply higher
prices for metals benefited exports from Chile, Jamaica, Peru and
Suriname. The exports of Chile and Peru surged by more than 40%, the
highest export growth rates reported in the region in 2006.
Box: Textiles and clothing trade
developments in 2006
In the second year after the phasing out of
the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing, the structural changes in
world trade of textiles and clothing continued unabatedly. Exporters
from developed countries and those from advanced developing
economies in East Asia are losing market share, together with major
developing suppliers in Central America and the Mediterranean
region, which process textiles originating from developed countries.
China’s exports continued to gain market share in all major
developed import markets despite restrictions introduced in 2005.
Some smaller suppliers expanded their textiles and clothing exports
even faster than China and the share of least-developed countries in
imports of the United States and the European Union increased
sharply in 2006.
The annual expansion rate of textiles and
clothing imports from China into Canada, the United States and the
EU was roughly halved between 2005 and 2006 in each of these three
markets. The combined textiles imports of the three economies from
China rose by 41% in 2005 and is estimated to have increased by 15%
in 2006. Despite the sharp deceleration this rate is still about
twice the rate of imports from all sources (with EU intra-trade
excluded). These import developments suggest that the introduction
of quotas in the United States and the EU in the course of 2005 had
a restrictive effect on textiles imports from China. On the other
hand, the deceleration in textiles exports from China to Canada was
about the same as to the United States in the absence of any new
quotas. The new restrictions also had no apparent effect on China’s
overall exports of textiles and clothing to the world, which
increased in 2006 by one quarter — somewhat faster than in 2005
(21%).
Imports of textiles and clothing of the four major
developed markets (incl. Japan) are estimated to have increased by
5.5%, to about $350 billion in 2006. This increase was slightly
faster than in the preceding year despite the deceleration in US
import growth, to less than 4%. In contrast to the moderate overall
import growth, intra-NAFTA textiles (and clothing) trade was
declining and that of intra-EU(25) stagnated in 2006. US imports
from CAFTA members and the Dominican Republic, and Sub-Saharan
Africa, declined by 7% and 10% respectively. The strongest decline
in US imports (–14%) was observed for the more advanced economies in
Asia (i.e. Hong Kong, China, Chinese Taipei and the Republic of
Korea). US imports from the EU (25), which still exceeded those from
India in 2005, decreased by 2.5% in 2006.
The import decline
from these suppliers was balanced by a double digit increase of
imports from six Asian countries. While imports from China increased
by 15% and accounted for nearly 30% of total US imports of textiles
and clothing, the rise in imports from Indonesia, Viet Nam,
Bangladesh and Cambodia exceeded that from China. Imports from
India, a major supplier to the United States, rose 12% in 2006,
which was less than the rate recorded by China.
The
re-shuffling of EU import shares had similarities with those of the
US market. Some of the major traditional suppliers (e.g. Turkey,
Romania, Morocco, Tunisia) lost market shares while Asian developing
countries increased their share. As in the US market, China expanded
its role as leading supplier, but imports from smaller Asian
suppliers tended to rise faster than those from China. Rather
untypical is the sharp rise of EU clothing imports from Hong Kong,
China in 2006.
Among the developed markets Japan’s textiles
and clothing imports are the most concentrated on China due both to
geographic proximity and the absence of import quotas in the recent
past. More than three quarters of Japan’s textiles and clothing
imports originated from China in 2006. The share exceeds 80% for
clothing imports.
At nearly 9%, Canada recorded with the
strongest rise in textiles and clothing imports of the four major
developed markets in 2006. Imports from China rose by more than 20%.
The structural shifts among suppliers observed in 2006 were similar
to those observed in the US market.
Imports of textiles and clothing into
major markets by origin, 2006 (Billion dollars and percentage
change)
|
United States |
EU(25) |
Japan |
Canada |
|
|
(Jan-Nov) |
|
|
World (value) |
106.4 |
183.6 |
30.0 |
11.2 |
|
Annual Growth |
World |
4 |
6 |
6 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
China |
15 |
10 |
8 |
22 |
India |
8 |
13 |
12 |
6 |
Pakistan |
12 |
12 |
-7 |
9 |
Bangladesh |
22 |
34 |
4 |
19 |
Cambodia |
25 |
19 |
... |
21 |
Indonesia |
25 |
19 |
4 |
18 |
Philippines |
9 |
26 |
... |
5 |
Viet Nam |
18 |
51 |
6 |
33 |
Thailand |
1 |
11 |
-2 |
0 |
Sri Lanka |
2 |
24 |
12 |
... |
East Asia (4) |
-14 |
33 |
-5 |
-12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Saharan Africa |
-10 |
9 |
... |
... |
Egypt |
32 |
14 |
... |
... |
Morocco |
69 |
3 |
... |
... |
Tunisia |
... |
0 |
29 |
—- |
|
|
|
|
|
CAFTA |
-7 |
... |
... |
... |
Mexico |
-10 |
13 |
6 |
7 |
Canada |
-7 |
6 |
-7 |
... |
United States |
... |
11 |
-3 |
-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
EU(25) |
-3 |
1 |
-2 |
2 |
Romania |
15 |
0 |
... |
... |
Bulgaria |
-18 |
12 |
... |
... |
Turkey |
-17 |
4 |
20 |
-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Memorandum items: |
|
|
|
|
Least-developed countries |
14 |
30 |
27 |
17 |
Hong Kong , China |
... |
67 |
... |
... |
Note: East Asia(4) comprises Chinese
Taipei, Hong Kong China, Macao China and the Republic of Korea.
EU(25) imports include intra-trade. Source: Global Trade Atlas and Eurostat,
COMEXT data base. |
It is clear from the discussion above
that trade expansion in 2006 was very favourable for the developing
countries as a group. Their combined merchandise exports rose by 20%, to
$4.27 trillion, and imports rose by 17%. The share of developing countries
in world merchandise exports reached with 36%, an all-time record level.
The share of developing countries in world merchandise imports was 31%,
the largest share in more than a quarter of a century. For the
least-developed countries, the expansion of merchandise exports has been
even stronger than for the developing countries over the last six years,
including 2006. Least-developed countries’ exports are estimated to have
increased by about 30%, to $108 billion in 2006. Their share in world
merchandise exports reached 0.9%, the highest level since 1980 (the first
year for which records are kept). Merchandise imports rose by 17%, which
was far less rapid than merchandise exports, leading the least-developed
countries as a group to record a trade surplus for the first time. Because
of differences in commodity composition, individual country performance,
and relative country size, aggregations such as developing countries and
least-developed countries are increasingly less meaningful for trade
analysis (see
Appendix Table 1)
The review of world merchandise trade by
leading exporters and importers reconfirms the importance of price
developments and the outstanding trade performance of China and India.
Among the thirty leading merchandise exporters, the eight most dynamic
(with export values up by more than 20% in 2006) comprise five oil
exporters, one metal exporter (Chile) and China and India (11). Moderate and sluggish export value growth of
less than 10% was reported by Japan (9%), France (6%), Spain (7%) and
Ireland (3%). The merchandise imports of these latter countries also
expanded far less rapidly than the world average. The ten leading
exporters comprise the same countries as the group of the top ten leading
importers, and although the annual variation of trade differed markedly
between the leading traders, the ranking did not change from the preceding
year, with the single exception of the merchandise imports of the United
Kingdom, which again surpassed those of Japan (see Appendix
Table 3 and 4).
Since
2000, China has more than doubled its share in world merchandise exports
and ranks as the third largest exporter and importer in merchandise trade.
Despite its strong export expansion, China remained the third largest
merchandise exporter in 2006. However, in the second half of 2006, China’s
merchandise exports exceeded those of the United States for the first
time.
World commercial services exports rose by 11% to $2.7
trillion in 2006 (12). The expansion rate of global services trade
was basically unchanged from the preceding year and that of the last six
years. Since 2003, commercial services exports expanded less rapidly each
year than merchandise trade.
Among the three broad commercial
services categories, transportation, travel and “other commercial
services”, the latter is by far the largest and also the fastest growing
category. In 2006, other commercial services categories expanded by 13%
while transportation and travel services were up by 9% and 7%
respectively. In the 1990s, transportation services expanded less rapidly
than travel, but since 2000 the situation has been reversed. The
relatively sluggish growth of travel services can be observed in all major
exporting regions but is most pronounced in North America’s services
trade.
Table 3: World exports of commercial
services trade by major category, 2006 back to top (Billion dollars and percentage
change)
|
Value |
Annual percentage change |
|
2006 |
2000-06 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
Commercial services |
2710 |
10 |
20 |
11 |
11 |
Transport |
626 |
10 |
25 |
12 |
9 |
Travel |
737 |
7 |
18 |
8 |
7 |
Other commercial services |
1347 |
12 |
19 |
12 |
13 |
Source:
WTO.
Commercial services trade by region is
presented in Appendix
Table 2. Europe and North America, recorded — as in the preceding year
— export and import growth below the world average. Within the European
Union services trade developments by member differed widely: services
exports of France and Finland are reported to have declined, while those
of Luxembourg and Poland expanded by one-quarter or more (13). The CIS region reports export and import
growth rates of commercial services of about 20%, the fastest growth of
all regions.
Asia’s commercial services exports continued for the
third consecutive year to expand faster than the global average and faster
than the region’s services imports, thereby reducing the region’s deficit
in services trade. Japan, the region’s largest commercial services trader,
increased its commercial services exports by 12% and its imports by 8%.
Among the major Asian traders India continues to excel in terms of its
services trade expansion. While the dynamic growth of India’s commercial —
and in particular software services (14) — exports are widely reported, the dynamic
expansion of its services imports attracts less attention even though the
growth rate in 2006 exceeded that of exports. According to the most recent
numbers, India’s commercial services imports are only about 5% short of
its commercial services exports.
The commercial services trade of
Africa and the Middle East are provisionally estimated to have expanded
close to the world average in 2006. But limitations in data availability
could make these estimates subject to larger revisions than for the
estimates provided for other regions.
The trade performance of the
leading commercial services exporter and importer differed widely in 2006.
The shifts in ranking should be interpreted with caution as they might be
due to changes in methodology, and given the incomplete data of major
traders, will be subject to revisions.
On the basis of the
preliminary data, it appears that the three top leading traders, namely
the United states, the United Kingdom and Germany, maintained their rank
for both exports and imports. If the export contraction of France’s
commercial services is confirmed, Japan would replace it as the world’s
fourth largest services exporter. Italy moved ahead of Spain to rank as
the sixth largest exporter. China’s commercial services exports are
estimated to have surpassed those of the Netherlands and India, entering
the group of the top ten exporters by moving ahead of Hong Kong, China
(15).
On the import side, no change
occurred among the top ten positions in 2006. According to the provisional
data, India’s imports are estimated to have exceeded slightly those of the
Republic of Korea, even though the latter imports also increased strongly
in 2006. (16)
Appendix Table 1 World merchandise
trade by region and selected country, 2006 back to top (Billion dollars and percentage)
|
Exports |
Imports |
|
Value |
Annual percentage change |
Value |
Annual percentage change |
|
2006 |
2000-06 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2006 |
2000-06 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
World |
11762 |
11 |
22 |
14 |
15 |
12080 |
11 |
22 |
13 |
14 |
North America |
1675 |
5 |
14 |
12 |
13 |
2546 |
7 |
17 |
14 |
11 |
United States |
1037 |
5 |
13 |
11 |
14 |
1920 |
7 |
17 |
14 |
11 |
Canada |
388 |
6 |
16 |
14 |
8 |
357 |
7 |
14 |
15 |
11 |
Mexico |
250 |
7 |
14 |
13 |
17 |
268 |
7 |
16 |
13 |
15 |
South and Central America a |
426 |
14 |
30 |
24 |
20 |
351 |
9 |
28 |
23 |
18 |
Brazil |
137 |
16 |
32 |
23 |
16 |
88 |
7 |
31 |
17 |
14 |
Other South and Central America a |
289 |
13 |
29 |
25 |
22 |
262 |
10 |
27 |
25 |
19 |
Europe |
4957 |
11 |
20 |
9 |
13 |
5218 |
11 |
20 |
10 |
14 |
European Union (25) |
4527 |
11 |
19 |
8 |
12 |
4743 |
11 |
20 |
9 |
14 |
Germany |
1112 |
12 |
21 |
7 |
15 |
910 |
11 |
18 |
9 |
17 |
United Kingdom |
443 |
8 |
14 |
11 |
15 |
601 |
10 |
20 |
9 |
17 |
France |
490 |
7 |
15 |
3 |
6 |
533 |
8 |
18 |
7 |
6 |
Italy |
410 |
9 |
18 |
5 |
10 |
436 |
11 |
19 |
8 |
13 |
Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) |
422 |
19 |
36 |
28 |
24 |
278 |
23 |
31 |
25 |
29 |
Russian Federation |
305 |
19 |
35 |
33 |
25 |
164 |
24 |
28 |
29 |
31 |
Africa |
361 |
16 |
31 |
30 |
21 |
290 |
14 |
28 |
20 |
16 |
South Africa |
58 |
12 |
26 |
12 |
13 |
77 |
17 |
35 |
17 |
24 |
Africa less South Africa |
303 |
17 |
32 |
34 |
23 |
213 |
13 |
26 |
22 |
13 |
Oil exporters b |
212 |
19 |
40 |
46 |
25 |
81 |
18 |
33 |
25 |
18 |
Non oil exporters |
90 |
13 |
20 |
14 |
17 |
131 |
11 |
23 |
20 |
10 |
Middle East |
644 |
16 |
33 |
35 |
19 |
373 |
14 |
31 |
19 |
14 |
Asia |
3276 |
12 |
25 |
16 |
18 |
3023 |
12 |
27 |
17 |
16 |
China |
969 |
25 |
35 |
28 |
27 |
792 |
23 |
36 |
18 |
20 |
Japan |
647 |
5 |
20 |
5 |
9 |
577 |
7 |
19 |
13 |
12 |
India |
120 |
19 |
30 |
30 |
21 |
174 |
23 |
37 |
41 |
25 |
Four East Asian traders c |
844 |
9 |
25 |
12 |
15 |
787 |
9 |
27 |
13 |
17 |
Memorandum items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MERCOSUR |
190 |
14 |
28 |
21 |
16 |
134 |
7 |
38 |
20 |
17 |
ASEAN |
771 |
10 |
20 |
15 |
18 |
683 |
10 |
25 |
17 |
14 |
EU (25) extra-trade |
1480 |
11 |
21 |
11 |
11 |
1697 |
11 |
21 |
15 |
15 |
Developing economies |
4274 |
14 |
27 |
22 |
20 |
3749 |
13 |
29 |
18 |
17 |
Least Developed Countries |
108 |
20 |
32 |
36 |
30 |
101 |
15 |
18 |
21 |
17 |
a Includes the Caribbean. For composition of
groups see the Technical Notes of WTO, International Trade Statistics,
2006. b Algeria, Angola, Cameroon, Chad, Congo, Equatorial
Guinea, Gabon, Libya, Nigeria, Sudan. c Chinese Taipei; Hong
Kong, China; Republic of Korea and Singapore. Source: WTO.
Appendix Table 2 World exports of
commercial services by region, 2006 back to top (Billion dollars and percentage)
|
Exports |
Imports |
|
Value |
Annual percentage change |
Value |
Annual percentage change |
|
2006 |
2000-06 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2006 |
2000-06 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
World |
2710 |
10 |
20 |
11 |
11 |
2620 |
10 |
19 |
11 |
10 |
North America |
460 |
6 |
13 |
10 |
9 |
401 |
7 |
15 |
9 |
9 |
United States |
387 |
6 |
14 |
10 |
9 |
307 |
7 |
16 |
9 |
9 |
South and Central America a |
77 |
9 |
16 |
18 |
14 |
80 |
7 |
14 |
21 |
14 |
Brazil |
18 |
12 |
21 |
28 |
21 |
27 |
9 |
12 |
38 |
20 |
Europe |
1382 |
11 |
20 |
9 |
9 |
1223 |
10 |
17 |
8 |
8 |
European Union (25) |
1247 |
12 |
19 |
9 |
9 |
1132 |
10 |
16 |
8 |
8 |
United Kingdom |
223 |
11 |
25 |
5 |
9 |
169 |
10 |
18 |
10 |
6 |
Germany |
164 |
13 |
17 |
10 |
11 |
214 |
8 |
13 |
4 |
7 |
France |
112 |
6 |
11 |
6 |
-2 |
108 |
10 |
19 |
8 |
3 |
Italy |
100 |
10 |
18 |
7 |
13 |
101 |
11 |
12 |
9 |
14 |
Spain |
100 |
12 |
16 |
9 |
8 |
77 |
15 |
24 |
11 |
18 |
Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) |
51 |
20 |
29 |
20 |
21 |
74 |
21 |
28 |
19 |
19 |
Russian Federation |
30 |
21 |
26 |
21 |
22 |
45 |
18 |
23 |
18 |
17 |
Africa |
64 |
13 |
21 |
12 |
12 |
80 |
13 |
23 |
21 |
12 |
Egypt |
16 |
9 |
30 |
3 |
10 |
10 |
6 |
24 |
27 |
9 |
South Africa |
12 |
16 |
16 |
15 |
8 |
14 |
16 |
28 |
18 |
17 |
Middle East |
63 |
11 |
16 |
14 |
9 |
96 |
12 |
23 |
19 |
10 |
Israel |
19 |
4 |
21 |
10 |
9 |
15 |
4 |
15 |
7 |
8 |
Asia |
614 |
12 |
27 |
14 |
15 |
666 |
10 |
24 |
12 |
14 |
Japan |
121 |
9 |
25 |
14 |
12 |
143 |
4 |
21 |
2 |
8 |
China |
87 |
... |
34 |
19 |
... |
100 |
... |
31 |
16 |
... |
India |
73 |
... |
... |
... |
34 |
70 |
... |
... |
... |
40 |
Four East Asian traders b |
208 |
10 |
22 |
9 |
14 |
197 |
10 |
23 |
10 |
12 |
a Includes the Caribbean. For composition of
groups see the Technical Notes of WTO, International Trade Statistics,
2006. b Chinese Taipei; Hong Kong, China; Republic of Korea and
Singapore. Note: While provisional full year data were available
in early March for 33 countries accounting for more than 60% of world
commercial services trade, estimates for most other countries are based on
data for the first three quarters (the first six months in the case of
China). Source: WTO.
Appendix Table 3 Leading exporters and
importers in world merchandise trade, 2006 back to top (Billion dollars and percentage)
Rank |
Exporters |
Value |
Share |
Annual % change |
Rank |
Importers |
Value |
Share |
Annual % change |
1 |
Germany |
1112 |
9.2 |
15 |
1 |
United States |
1920 |
15.5 |
11 |
2 |
United States |
1037 |
8.6 |
14 |
2 |
Germany |
910 |
7.4 |
17 |
3 |
China |
969 |
8.0 |
27 |
3 |
China |
792 |
6.4 |
20 |
4 |
Japan |
647 |
5.4 |
9 |
4 |
United Kingdom |
601 |
4.9 |
17 |
5 |
France |
490 |
4.1 |
6 |
5 |
Japan |
577 |
4.7 |
12 |
6 |
Netherlands |
462 |
3.8 |
14 |
6 |
France |
533 |
4.3 |
6 |
7 |
United Kingdom |
443 |
3.7 |
15 |
7 |
Italy |
436 |
3.5 |
13 |
8 |
Italy |
410 |
3.4 |
10 |
8 |
Netherlands |
416 |
3.4 |
14 |
9 |
Canada |
388 |
3.2 |
8 |
9 |
Canada |
357 |
2.9 |
11 |
10 |
Belgium |
372 |
3.1 |
11 |
10 |
Belgium |
356 |
2.9 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
Korea, Republic of |
326 |
2.7 |
15 |
11 |
Hong Kong, China |
336 |
2.7 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
retained imports a, b |
36 |
0.3 |
... |
12 |
Hong Kong, China |
323 |
2.7 |
10 |
12 |
Spain |
319 |
2.6 |
10 |
|
domestic exports b |
23 |
0.2 |
... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
re-exports b |
300 |
2.5 |
... |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
Russian Federation |
305 |
2.5 |
25 |
13 |
Korea, Republic of |
309 |
2.5 |
18 |
14 |
Singapore |
272 |
2.3 |
18 |
14 |
Mexico b |
268 |
2.2 |
15 |
|
domestic exports |
143 |
1.2 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
re-exports |
129 |
1.1 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
Mexico |
250 |
2.1 |
17 |
15 |
Singapore |
239 |
1.9 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
retained imports a |
110 |
0.9 |
16 |
16 |
Taipei, Chinese |
224 |
1.9 |
13 |
16 |
Taipei, Chinese |
203 |
1.6 |
11 |
17 |
Saudi Arabia b |
209 |
1.7 |
16 |
17 |
India |
174 |
1.4 |
25 |
18 |
Spain |
206 |
1.7 |
7 |
18 |
Russian Federation c |
164 |
1.3 |
31 |
19 |
Malaysia |
161 |
1.3 |
14 |
19 |
Switzerland |
141 |
1.1 |
12 |
20 |
Switzerland |
147 |
1.2 |
13 |
20 |
Australia b |
140 |
1.1 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
Sweden |
147 |
1.2 |
13 |
21 |
Austria |
139 |
1.1 |
9 |
22 |
United Arab Emirates |
139 |
1.2 |
21 |
22 |
Turkey |
137 |
1.1 |
17 |
23 |
Austria |
138 |
1.1 |
11 |
23 |
Malaysia |
131 |
1.1 |
14 |
24 |
Brazil |
137 |
1.1 |
16 |
24 |
Thailand |
129 |
1.0 |
9 |
25 |
Thailand |
131 |
1.1 |
19 |
25 |
Sweden |
126 |
1.0 |
13 |
26 |
Australia |
123 |
1.0 |
16 |
26 |
Poland |
124 |
1.0 |
22 |
27 |
Norway |
122 |
1.0 |
17 |
27 |
United Arab Emirates b |
95 |
0.8 |
17 |
28 |
India |
120 |
1.0 |
21 |
28 |
Czech Republic |
93 |
0.8 |
22 |
29 |
Ireland |
113 |
0.9 |
3 |
29 |
Brazil |
88 |
0.7 |
14 |
30 |
Poland |
110 |
0.9 |
23 |
30 |
Denmark |
86 |
0.7 |
14 |
|
Total of above d |
10033 |
83.2 |
- |
|
Total of above d |
10340 |
83.5 |
- |
|
World d |
12062 |
100.0 |
15 |
|
World d |
12380 |
100.0 |
14 |
a Retained imports are defined as imports
less re-exports. b Secretariat estimates. c Imports
are valued f.o.b. d Includes significant re-exports or imports
for re-export. Source: WTO.
Appendix Table 4 Leading exporters and
importers in world merchandise trade (excluding intra-EU(25) trade),
2006 back to top (Billion dollars and percentage)
Rank |
Exporters |
Value |
Share |
Annual % change |
Rank |
Importers |
Value |
Share |
Annual % change |
1 |
Extra-EU (25) exports |
1480 |
16.4 |
11 |
1 |
United States |
1920 |
20.6 |
11 |
2 |
United States |
1037 |
11.5 |
14 |
2 |
Extra-EU (25) imports |
1697 |
18.2 |
15 |
3 |
China |
969 |
10.7 |
27 |
3 |
China |
792 |
8.5 |
20 |
4 |
Japan |
647 |
7.2 |
9 |
4 |
Japan |
577 |
6.2 |
12 |
5 |
Canada |
388 |
4.3 |
8 |
5 |
Canada |
357 |
3.8 |
11 |
6 |
Korea, Republic of |
326 |
3.6 |
15 |
6 |
Hong Kong, China |
336 |
3.6 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
retained imports a, b |
36 |
0.4 |
... |
7 |
Hong Kong, China |
323 |
3.6 |
10 |
7 |
Korea, Republic of |
309 |
3.3 |
18 |
|
domestic exports b |
23 |
0.3 |
... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
re-exports b |
300 |
3.3 |
... |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
Russian Federation |
305 |
3.4 |
25 |
8 |
Mexico b |
268 |
2.9 |
15 |
9 |
Singapore |
272 |
3.0 |
18 |
9 |
Singapore |
239 |
2.6 |
19 |
|
domestic exports |
143 |
1.6 |
15 |
|
retained imports a |
110 |
1.2 |
16 |
|
re-exports |
129 |
1.4 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
Mexico |
250 |
2.8 |
17 |
10 |
Taipei, Chinese |
203 |
2.2 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
Taipei, Chinese |
224 |
2.5 |
13 |
11 |
India |
174 |
1.9 |
25 |
12 |
Saudi Arabia b |
209 |
2.3 |
16 |
12 |
Russian Federation c |
164 |
1.8 |
31 |
13 |
Malaysia |
161 |
1.8 |
14 |
13 |
Switzerland |
141 |
1.5 |
12 |
14 |
Switzerland |
147 |
1.6 |
13 |
14 |
Australia b |
140 |
1.5 |
11 |
15 |
United Arab Emirates |
139 |
1.5 |
21 |
15 |
Turkey |
137 |
1.5 |
17 |
16 |
Brazil |
137 |
1.5 |
16 |
16 |
Malaysia |
131 |
1.4 |
14 |
17 |
Thailand |
131 |
1.4 |
19 |
17 |
Thailand |
129 |
1.4 |
9 |
18 |
Australia |
123 |
1.4 |
16 |
18 |
United Arab Emirates b |
95 |
1.0 |
17 |
19 |
Norway |
122 |
1.3 |
17 |
19 |
Brazil |
88 |
0.9 |
14 |
20 |
India |
120 |
1.3 |
21 |
20 |
Indonesia |
78 |
0.8 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
Indonesia |
104 |
1.2 |
21 |
21 |
South Africa b |
77 |
0.8 |
24 |
22 |
Turkey |
85 |
0.9 |
16 |
22 |
Saudi Arabia b |
65 |
0.7 |
9 |
23 |
Iran, Islamic Rep. of b |
75 |
0.8 |
34 |
23 |
Norway |
64 |
0.7 |
15 |
24 |
Bolivarian Rep. of Venezuela b |
63 |
0.7 |
14 |
24 |
Philippines b, c |
52 |
0.6 |
10 |
25 |
Chile |
59 |
0.7 |
45 |
25 |
Romania |
51 |
0.5 |
26 |
26 |
South Africa |
58 |
0.6 |
13 |
26 |
Iran , Islamic Rep. of b |
51 |
0.5 |
34 |
27 |
Kuwait b |
54 |
0.6 |
21 |
27 |
Israel b |
50 |
0.5 |
6 |
28 |
Algeria |
53 |
0.6 |
15 |
28 |
Ukraine |
45 |
0.5 |
25 |
29 |
Nigeria b |
52 |
0.6 |
23 |
29 |
Viet Nam |
44 |
0.5 |
20 |
30 |
Philippines |
47 |
0.5 |
14 |
30 |
Chile |
38 |
0.4 |
18 |
|
Total of above d |
8160 |
90.5 |
- |
|
Total of above d |
8513 |
91.2 |
- |
|
World (excl. intra-EU (25)) d |
9015 |
100.0 |
16 |
|
World (excl. intra-EU (25)) d |
9333 |
100.0 |
15 |
a Retained imports are defined as imports
less re-exports b Secretariat estimates. c Imports
are valued f.o.b. d Includes significant re-exports or imports
for re-export. Source: WTO.
Appendix Table 5 Leading exporters and
importers in world commercial services trade, 2006 back to top (Billion dollars and percentage)
|
|
|
|
Annual |
|
|
|
|
Annual |
Rank |
Exporters |
Value |
Share |
% |
Rank |
Importers |
Value |
Share |
% |
|
|
|
|
change |
|
|
|
|
change |
1 |
United States |
387 |
14.3 |
9 |
1 |
United States |
307 |
11.7 |
9 |
2 |
United Kingdom |
223 |
8.2 |
9 |
2 |
Germany |
215 |
8.2 |
7 |
3 |
Germany |
164 |
6.1 |
11 |
3 |
United Kingdom |
169 |
6.5 |
6 |
4 |
Japan |
121 |
4.5 |
12 |
4 |
Japan |
143 |
5.5 |
8 |
5 |
France |
112 |
4.1 |
-2 |
5 |
France |
108 |
4.1 |
3 |
6 |
Italy |
101 |
3.7 |
13 |
6 |
Italy |
101 |
3.9 |
14 |
7 |
Spain |
100 |
3.7 |
8 |
7 |
China |
100 |
3.8 |
... |
8 |
China |
87 |
3.2 |
... |
8 |
Netherlands |
78 |
3.0 |
7 |
9 |
Netherlands |
82 |
3.0 |
4 |
9 |
Ireland |
77 |
3.0 |
11 |
10 |
India |
73 |
2.7 |
34 |
10 |
Spain |
77 |
2.9 |
18 |
11 |
Hong Kong, China |
71 |
2.6 |
15 |
11 |
Canada |
72 |
2.7 |
12 |
12 |
Ireland |
67 |
2.5 |
17 |
12 |
India |
70 |
2.7 |
40 |
13 |
Singapore |
57 |
2.1 |
12 |
13 |
Korea, Republic of |
69 |
2.7 |
20 |
14 |
Belgium |
57 |
2.1 |
7 |
14 |
Singapore |
61 |
2.3 |
12 |
15 |
Canada |
56 |
2.1 |
7 |
15 |
Belgium |
54 |
2.0 |
6 |
16 |
Korea, Republic of |
51 |
1.9 |
16 |
16 |
Russian Federation |
45 |
1.7 |
17 |
17 |
Denmark |
50 |
1.9 |
19 |
17 |
Denmark |
44 |
1.7 |
17 |
18 |
Luxembourg |
50 |
1.9 |
25 |
18 |
Austria |
40 |
1.5 |
... |
19 |
Austria |
50 |
1.8 |
... |
19 |
Sweden |
39 |
1.5 |
12 |
20 |
Sweden |
50 |
1.8 |
17 |
20 |
Hong Kong, China |
35 |
1.3 |
7 |
21 |
Switzerland |
50 |
1.8 |
8 |
21 |
Taipei, Chinese |
33 |
1.2 |
3 |
22 |
Greece |
36 |
1.3 |
5 |
22 |
Thailand |
32 |
1.2 |
18 |
23 |
Australia |
32 |
1.2 |
6 |
23 |
Australia |
32 |
1.2 |
6 |
24 |
Norway |
32 |
1.2 |
10 |
24 |
Norway |
31 |
1.2 |
7 |
25 |
Russian Federation |
30 |
1.1 |
22 |
25 |
Luxembourg |
31 |
1.2 |
23 |
26 |
Taipei , Chinese |
29 |
1.1 |
13 |
26 |
Switzerland |
27 |
1.0 |
5 |
27 |
Thailand |
24 |
0.9 |
18 |
27 |
Brazil |
27 |
1.0 |
20 |
28 |
Turkey |
24 |
0.9 |
-8 |
28 |
Indonesia |
27 |
1.0 |
... |
29 |
Poland |
21 |
0.8 |
28 |
29 |
Malaysia |
23 |
0.9 |
6 |
30 |
Malaysia |
21 |
0.8 |
5 |
30 |
Mexico |
23 |
0.9 |
8 |
|
Total of above |
2305 |
85.1 |
- |
|
Total of above |
2185 |
83.5 |
- |
|
World |
2710 |
100.0 |
11 |
|
World |
2620 |
100.0 |
10 |
Note: While provisional full year data were
available in early March for 33 countries accounting for more than 60% of
world commercial services trade, estimates for most other countries are
based on data for the first three quarters (the first six months in the
case of China). Source: WTO
Footnotes
1. UNCTAD, UNCTAD
Investment Brief, No.1, 2007. back to text 2. Institute for International Finance, Capital Flows
to Emerging Market Economies, January 18, 2007. back to text 3. IMF, World Economic Outlook, April 2007, Table
40. back to text 4. The ratio of the US current account deficit to US
GDP is estimated to have remained unchanged in 2006 and the deficit
started to decline in current dollar terms in the fourth quarter of
2006 . back to text 5. JPMorgan, Real broad effective exchange rate
indices. Direct communication to the WTO Secretariat. back to text 6. IMF, World Economic Outlook, April 2007. back to text 7. OECD, OECD Economic Outlook December 2006, UN,
World Economic Situation and Prospects 2007, January 2007 and IMF, World
Economic Outlook, April 2007. back to text 8. There are indications that some imports are not
fully covered in the regular trade returns which could lead not only to an
underreporting of the level of imports but also to an underestimation of
their import growth. back to text 9. Merchandise trade values for 2006 were estimated
on the basis of monthly customs data while commercial services data are
derived from Balance of Payments statistics. The latter are typically
available later than merchandise trade data, contributing to a greater
uncertainty in the estimates for services than for merchandise trade in
2006. back to text 10. Dollar export prices of manufactured goods
increased in the United States and Germany by 2.5% and 1.7% respectively
while those of Japan decreased by 2.5% in 2006. China’s export unit value
index for manufactured goods rose by 3.6% in 2006. back to text 11. Although India is a net-fuel importer it exports
large volumes of oil production processed from imported crude
oil. back to text 12. Commercial services data are derived from
Balance of Payments statistics which do not include the sales of
majority-owned foreign affiliates abroad (commercial
presence). back to text 13. The decline in services exports of France and
Finland are concentrated in the group “other commercial services”.
Economic explanations for this decrease have yet to be identified. In the
case of Luxembourg the marked rise in services exports can be attributed
to the strength in financial services. back to text 14. Comprising computer services, IT enabled
services and business process outsourcing. back to text 15. At the time of writing (early March 2007)
published information on China's services trade is limited to the first
half of 2006. back to text 16. India's services imports are adjusted to include
all freight transportation services to conform to the standard definitions
of the IMF, Balance of Payments Manual (5th edition). back to text
|
> Download this press release (pdf format, 21 pages, 183KB) >
Download all tables and charts (zip
format, 157KB) > Guide to downloading
files.
Tables and charts: Chart 1:
Real
GDP and trade growth of United States, 2005-06 Chart 2: Growth
in the volume of world merchandise trade and GDP, 1996-06 Table
1: GDP
and merchandise trade by region, 2004-06 Chart 3: Real
merchandise trade growth by region, 2006 Chart 4: Export
prices of selected primary products, 2005 and 2006 Chart 5:
Dollar
changes vis-à-vis selected major currencies, 2001-2006 Table 2:
World
exports of merchandise and commercial services, 2006 Table
3: World
exports of commercial services trade by major category,
2006 Appendix Table 1: World
merchandise trade by region and selected country, 2006 Appendix
Table 2: World
exports of commercial services by region, 2006 Appendix Table
3: Leading
exporters and importers in world merchandise trade,
2006 Appendix Table 4: Leading
exporters and importers in world merchandise trade (excluding intra-EU(25)
trade), 2006 Appendix Table 5: Leading
exporters and importers in world commercial services trade, 2006
> Problems viewing this
page? Please contact javascript:emailWTO('webmaster@wto.org',%20'WTO%20error%20-%20Problem%20with%20page')
giving details of the operating system and web browser you are using.
|